Skip to content

Add prompt to evaluate skills description#370

Closed
Evangelink wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
Evangelink:dev/amauryleve/prompt
Closed

Add prompt to evaluate skills description#370
Evangelink wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
Evangelink:dev/amauryleve/prompt

Conversation

@Evangelink
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add to repo the prompt created by @ManishJayaswal to help improving skills description.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 16, 2026 08:38
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

This PR is from a fork and modifies infrastructure files (eng/ or .github/).

Changes to infrastructure typically need to be submitted from a branch in dotnet/skills (not a fork) so that CI workflows run with the correct permissions and secrets.

Please consider recreating this PR from an upstream branch. If you don't have push access to dotnet/skills, ask a maintainer to push your branch for you.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a GitHub prompt file intended to help evaluate and improve the description frontmatter across all skills so agents can more reliably decide when to load them.

Changes:

  • Introduces a new .prompt.md file under .github/prompts/ describing a rubric and instructions for rating skill descriptions.
  • Provides examples of strong vs weak descriptions and a required output format (per-skill feedback + summary table).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
---
mode: ask
description: Evaluate skill description quality in frontmatter across all plugins and rate them 1-5.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants